[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should nXML be included
From: |
Peter Heslin |
Subject: |
Re: Should nXML be included |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:17:59 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.93 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden writes:
> James Clark appears to be difficult to contact these days, however,
> which might prove an obstacle for inclusion.
Not necessarily. The files in question say that they are copyright FSF,
and I assume that James has papers on file for the other parts of Emacs
that he has contributed. I hope these would cover nxml too.
An example header:
;;; nxml-mode.el --- a new XML mode
;; Copyright (C) 2003, 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
;; Author: James Clark
;; Keywords: XML
--
Peter Heslin (http://www.dur.ac.uk/p.j.heslin)
Re: Should nXML be included, Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/12
Re: Should nXML be included, Peter Heslin, 2007/06/12
- Re: Should nXML be included, Leo, 2007/06/12
- Re: Should nXML be included, joakim, 2007/06/12
- Re: Should nXML be included,
Peter Heslin <=
- Re: Should nXML be included, David Kastrup, 2007/06/12
- Re: Should nXML be included, Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/12
- Re: Should nXML be included, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/13
- Re: Should nXML be included, Claus, 2007/06/13
- Re: Should nXML be included, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/14
- Re: Should nXML be included, Leo, 2007/06/14
- Re: Should nXML be included, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/15
- Re: Should nXML be included, Eric Hanchrow, 2007/06/14