[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MacOS port functional too
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: MacOS port functional too |
|
Date: |
Sun, 20 May 2007 21:59:39 +0300 |
> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 11:26:23 +0200
> Cc: Emacs Devel <address@hidden>
>
> From what Eli has said, there seems to be little point in
> going overboard keeping MSDOS functional in the trunk for now.
Yes, the MSDOS port should not be considered as a factor for this
decision.
- Re: [multi-tty] Emacs port status, (continued)
- Re: [multi-tty] Emacs port status, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/05/20
- Re: [multi-tty] Emacs port status, Richard Stallman, 2007/05/20
- Re: [multi-tty] Emacs port status, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/05/20
- Re: [multi-tty] Emacs port status, Kenichi Handa, 2007/05/20
- Re: [multi-tty] Emacs port status, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/05/20
- Re: [multi-tty] Emacs port status, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/05/20
- Re: [multi-tty] Emacs port status, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/05/20
Re: [multi-tty] Emacs port status, rentey <address@hidden>, 2007/05/17
MacOS port functional too (was Re: [multi-tty] Emacs port status), Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/05/19
- Re: MacOS port functional too, David Kastrup, 2007/05/20
- Re: MacOS port functional too,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: MacOS port functional too, Jason Rumney, 2007/05/20
- vms for emacs [was: MacOS port functional too], Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2007/05/21
- Re: vms for emacs, David Kastrup, 2007/05/21
- Re: vms for emacs, jasonr, 2007/05/21
- Re: vms for emacs, David Kastrup, 2007/05/21
- Re: vms for emacs, Miles Bader, 2007/05/21
- Re: vms for emacs, Richard Stallman, 2007/05/22
Re: vms for emacs [was: MacOS port functional too], Chip Coldwell, 2007/05/21
Re: vms for emacs [was: MacOS port functional too], dhruva, 2007/05/22
Re: MacOS port functional too, Richard Stallman, 2007/05/21