Re: Emacs pretest 22.0.99

[Nick Roberts]

 > > It looks like 21.1 is actually 21.1.1, 21.2 is actually 21.2.1 etc - I
 > > didn't realise that.  No, I was suggesting 22.1.2, 22.1.3 etc as bug-fix
 > > release numbers (now omitting 22.1.1).
 > 
 > If we release version 22.1.2, then its first build on the end-user
 > machine would be 22.1.2.1, the second build 22.1.2.2, etc.  This is
 > what I meant: you are suggesting to enlarge the number of digits in
 > the version string.

I think I see what you are saying: if someone builds the release 22.1 more than
once it's built as 22.1.1, 22.1.2 etc. - I've only built from CVS.

OK, sorry for my confusion.

-- 
Nick                                           http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob