[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Apr 2007 13:12:54 +0300 |
> Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 17:14:51 +0100
> From: Jason Rumney <address@hidden>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>, address@hidden,
> address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> Kenichi Handa wrote:
> >> http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms633586.aspx
> >>
> >> for the gory details.
> >>
> >
> > Ummm, by reading that page briefly, it seems that getting
> > Unicode codepoints is much easier.
> >
>
> It seems easier, but in fact to DTRT according to the documentation
> above means dropping support for Windows 95, 98 and ME, and modifying
> ALL system messages to use Unicode, which is major work. I think it is
> worth doing that for Emacs 22, because Windows 98 and ME are almost dead
> now, and probably will be by the time Emacs 22 s released, and also with
> the change of Emacs' internal representation, Unicode fits better.
I added an entry to etc/TODO based on this.
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, (continued)
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/04
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/04
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Jason Rumney, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Jason Rumney, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/04
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/04
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/04