Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence

[Kenichi Handa]

In article <address@hidden>, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

> Why not?  It seems that the character should be decoded by visiting
> the file, and converted into the proper character code.

>     That part is ok.  The problem is that the current Windows
>     code generates an event M-\351 instead of M-é.

> Isn't that a bug?  It ought to handle the é the same regardless of
> the modifiers.

I think it's a bug.  It surely handles the é the same
regardless of the modifiers.  In both cases, it doesn't
decode the key event \351 to é.  Windows code ask
encoded-kbd-mode to decode it.  And, although
Encoded-kbd-mode can decode \351 to é, it can't decode
M-\351 to M-é.

---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden