[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: transpose-sexps
From: |
Paul Pogonyshev |
Subject: |
Re: transpose-sexps |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Jan 2007 00:02:14 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.7.2 |
Stuart D. Herring wrote:
> It assumes that you are outside of strings or lists, so it saw
> " "
> and
> f
> as your two sexps, and exchanged them. It's just confusing that it looks
> like the f was moved into the other string.
It's not just confusing, it's a bug. If it doesn't work and this is not
(easily) fixable, make it do nothing or report an error. Producing confusing
results is worse than doing nothing.
Paul
- transpose-sexps, Paul Pogonyshev, 2007/01/04
- Re: transpose-sexps, Stuart D. Herring, 2007/01/04
- Re: transpose-sexps,
Paul Pogonyshev <=
- Re: transpose-sexps, Stuart D. Herring, 2007/01/04
- Re: transpose-sexps, Andreas Schwab, 2007/01/04
- Re: transpose-sexps, Paul Pogonyshev, 2007/01/04
- Re: transpose-sexps, Miles Bader, 2007/01/05
- Re: transpose-sexps, Paul Pogonyshev, 2007/01/05
- Re: transpose-sexps, Stuart D. Herring, 2007/01/08
- Re: transpose-sexps, Paul Pogonyshev, 2007/01/08
- Re: transpose-sexps, Stuart D. Herring, 2007/01/08
- Re: transpose-sexps, Stefan Monnier, 2007/01/08
- Re: transpose-sexps, Stuart D. Herring, 2007/01/08