Re: Strange eval-after-load

[Nick Roberts]

 > To construe this form as "modifying the behaviour of another Lisp file
 > (?edebug, presumably) in an invisible way" seems like a total perversion
 > of reality to me.

To exaggerate the case makes it appear weaker not stronger.

 >                    I would call this e-a-l "Telling another Lisp file
 > how to handle the current one" - in essence, the module which is
 > modified by this e-a-l is cc-defs, not edebug.

Theres a more fundamental reality here: Richard perceives eval-after-load
as bad and he is project mainatainer.

-- 
Nick                                           http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob