[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Strange eval-after-load
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Strange eval-after-load |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Jul 2006 19:21:03 -0400 |
I don't really understand what the situation is over which control has
to be got. It is possible to to use eval-after-load badly, just as it
is possible to use goto badly.
I want to make sure no additional bad uses are installed, and
meanwhile get rid of the ones that are already installed.
Rather than banning eval-after-load, why not formulate when it is
acceptable to use it, and put this advice into the Elisp manual?
Theoretically, there could be good ways to use it in Emacs,
but I do not know of any use which I would describe as good.
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, (continued)
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/07/05
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, David Kastrup, 2006/07/05
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/07/06
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, David Kastrup, 2006/07/06
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/07
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/07/07
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/05
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/05
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/07/05
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/03
- Re: Strange eval-after-load,
Richard Stallman <=