[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: text_property_stickiness
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: text_property_stickiness |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Jun 2006 12:16:17 -0400 |
I just checked the code and since `get_pos_property' is only called with
the initial position being passed by the original caller, I think you're
right, it does make sense to signal an error if it's out of range.
Since you agree with this, let's do it. Would someone please do it?
- text_property_stickiness, Chong Yidong, 2006/06/24
- Re: text_property_stickiness, Richard Stallman, 2006/06/25
- Re: text_property_stickiness, Chong Yidong, 2006/06/25
- Re: text_property_stickiness, Miles Bader, 2006/06/26
- Re: text_property_stickiness, Chong Yidong, 2006/06/26
- Re: text_property_stickiness, Miles Bader, 2006/06/26
- Re: text_property_stickiness,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: text_property_stickiness, Chong Yidong, 2006/06/27
- Re: text_property_stickiness, Richard Stallman, 2006/06/29
- Re: text_property_stickiness, Richard Stallman, 2006/06/27
- Re: text_property_stickiness, Richard Stallman, 2006/06/26