[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PURESIZE increased (again)
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: PURESIZE increased (again) |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:15:46 +0300 |
> From: Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>
> Cc: Luc Teirlinck <address@hidden>, address@hidden,
> address@hidden
> Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 16:18:22 +0200
>
> The padding used by pure_alloc depends on USE_LSB_TAG, which may explain
> the difference.
Thanks.
But this will only explain the difference if Reiner says that he
disabled USE_LSB_TAG (which AFAIK is on by default on x86_64 GNU/Linux
systems). I simply built the checked-out tree, so my value of
USE_LSB_TAG should be the default.
Reiner?
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), (continued)
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/28
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Luc Teirlinck, 2006/04/27
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/28
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Stefan Monnier, 2006/04/28
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/28
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Luc Teirlinck, 2006/04/27
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Ken Raeburn, 2006/04/27
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Luc Teirlinck, 2006/04/27
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Ken Raeburn, 2006/04/27
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Andreas Schwab, 2006/04/28
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again),
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Reiner Steib, 2006/04/28
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Luc Teirlinck, 2006/04/27
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Ken Raeburn, 2006/04/27
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), David Kastrup, 2006/04/27
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Ken Raeburn, 2006/04/27
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/28
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/28
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), David Kastrup, 2006/04/28
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Ken Raeburn, 2006/04/28
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/28