[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PURESIZE increased (again)
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: PURESIZE increased (again) |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:37:59 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> (I imagine you already know that.)
> No, I didn't know. And I don't know why these numbers are so low on
> my machines. How can I investigate? Will it cause problems?
AFAIK these low numbers have no meaning: if the pure size overflows, the
number printed is always some ridiculously low number, unrelated to the
actual size of the pure space (or more specifically: probably somehow
related, but not equal to).
Stefan
- PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/16
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/16
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Romain Francoise, 2006/04/16
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Andreas Schwab, 2006/04/16
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/16
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Reiner Steib, 2006/04/20
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/20
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Reiner Steib, 2006/04/20
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again),
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/21
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/21
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/21
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Reiner Steib, 2006/04/26
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/27
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), David Kastrup, 2006/04/27
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/28
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Luc Teirlinck, 2006/04/27
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/28
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Stefan Monnier, 2006/04/28