[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs doc changes
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: emacs doc changes |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:01:11 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110005 (No Gnus v0.5) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On 19 Apr 2006, address@hidden wrote:
> Is there a reason not to use unified diffs ("diff -u") when
> available? Of course, not all diff programs can provide them, but
> GNU diff does, and patch understands them just as well, and I find
> it quite more human-readable (if I consider myself representative
> for a human, that is).
RMS has asked me for context diffs before, so I'm guessing unified
patches are less useful to Emacs maintainers... I can provide -u as
well, since I would just do "cvs diff -u" instead of "cvs diff -c".
Ted
- Re: emacs-Xtra, (continued)
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Ted Zlatanov, 2006/04/14
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/14
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/15
- Re: emacs-Xtra, David Kastrup, 2006/04/15
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Ted Zlatanov, 2006/04/18
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/19
- emacs doc changes (was: emacs-Xtra), Ted Zlatanov, 2006/04/19
- Re: emacs doc changes, Ted Zlatanov, 2006/04/19
- Re: emacs doc changes (was: emacs-Xtra), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/19
- Re: emacs doc changes, David Kastrup, 2006/04/19
- Re: emacs doc changes,
Ted Zlatanov <=
- Re: emacs doc changes, David Kastrup, 2006/04/19
- Re: emacs doc changes, Giorgos Keramidas, 2006/04/19
- Re: emacs doc changes, Stefan Monnier, 2006/04/19
- Re: emacs doc changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/20
- Re: emacs doc changes, David Kastrup, 2006/04/20
- Re: emacs doc changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/20
- Re: emacs doc changes, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/20
- Re: emacs doc changes, Stefan Monnier, 2006/04/20
- Re: emacs doc changes, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/27
- Re: emacs doc changes, Stefan Monnier, 2006/04/30