[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode? |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Apr 2006 21:37:34 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> The code is probably ugly because it actually works on 95% of Perl code out
> there, instead of perl-mode which requires a lot more of "you code for
> perl-mode, instead of perl-mode helping you".
Could be, but note that current perl-mode is quite a bit better in
this respect. Maybe still not as good as cperl-mode, but not nearly as far
as it used to be (and in some cases, better).
Stefan
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?, (continued)
Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode? (was Re: perl-mode indent bug), Richard Stallman, 2006/04/12
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode? (was Re: perl-mode indent bug), Randal L. Schwartz, 2006/04/12
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode? (was Re: perl-mode indent bug), Richard Stallman, 2006/04/13
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode? (was Re: perl-mode indent bug), Randal L. Schwartz, 2006/04/13
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?, Stefan Monnier, 2006/04/13
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/14
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?, Stefan Monnier, 2006/04/14
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?, Randal L. Schwartz, 2006/04/14
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/15
Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/15
Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?, Piet van Oostrum, 2006/04/15