[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Macro vs Function
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Macro vs Function |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Apr 2006 14:13:15 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Herbert Euler" <address@hidden> writes:
>>From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
>>To: "Herbert Euler" <address@hidden>
>>CC: address@hidden
>>Subject: Re: Macro vs Function
>>Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 13:19:17 +0200
>>
>>Macro arguments are _never_ evaluated. They are passed quoted
>>into the macro, the macro gets executed, and the return value of
>>the macro gets evaluated.
>
> This verifies my hypothesis.
There is no need to make "hypotheses". Read the Elisp manual.
(info "(elisp) Macros")
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Macro vs Function, (continued)
- Re: Macro vs Function, David Kastrup, 2006/04/12
- Re: Macro vs Function, Herbert Euler, 2006/04/12
- Re: Macro vs Function, Herbert Euler, 2006/04/12
- Re: Macro vs Function, David Kastrup, 2006/04/12
- Re: Macro vs Function, Herbert Euler, 2006/04/12
- Re: Macro vs Function, David Kastrup, 2006/04/12
- Re: Macro vs Function, David Kastrup, 2006/04/12
Re: Macro vs Function, Herbert Euler, 2006/04/12
- Re: Macro vs Function,
David Kastrup <=