[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Problem report #31
From: |
Stuart D. Herring |
Subject: |
Re: Problem report #31 |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Apr 2006 10:34:50 -0700 (PDT) |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-11.EL3 |
> Event var_assign: NEGATIVE return value of "emacs_open" assigned to signed
> variable "new_outfd"
> Also see events: [var_assign][negative_returns]
>
> 6233 new_outfd = emacs_open (NULL_DEVICE, O_WRONLY, 0);
> 6234 old_outfd = XINT (XPROCESS (proc)->outfd);
> 6235
>
> Event negative_returns: Tracked variable "new_outfd" used as index to
> array "proc_encode_coding_system"
> Also see events: [negative_return_fn][var_assign]
>
> 6236 if (!proc_encode_coding_system[new_outfd])
Seems kinda unlikely that opening the null device would fail, but I
suppose it's possible. Should probably check this.
Davis
--
This product is sold by volume, not by mass. If it appears too dense or
too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during
shipping.
- Problem report #31, Dan Nicolaescu, 2006/04/11
- Re: Problem report #31,
Stuart D. Herring <=