[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why min-colors 88?
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Why min-colors 88? |
Date: |
Sun, 05 Feb 2006 21:32:33 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> Whoops, I meant to say 88 different colors in all of its faces.
Actually no. All it really means is that the automatic color-approximation
algorithm used by Emacs works well enough on terminals with 88 colors and
up, so that more manual fiddling has not been needed.
Stefan
- Why min-colors 88?, Bill Wohler, 2006/02/03
- Re: Why min-colors 88?, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/02/04
- Re: Why min-colors 88?, Bill Wohler, 2006/02/05
- Re: Why min-colors 88?, Stefan Monnier, 2006/02/05
- Re: Why min-colors 88?, Bill Wohler, 2006/02/05
- Re: Why min-colors 88?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2006/02/05
- Re: Why min-colors 88?, Bill Wohler, 2006/02/05
- Re: Why min-colors 88?, Miles Bader, 2006/02/05
- Re: Why min-colors 88?,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Why min-colors 88?, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/02/05