[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jan 2006 10:05:43 +0900 |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> So, I think the name cpXXXXs have already acquired
>> citizenship, and thus it is a lack of sophistication not to
>> support the name cpXXXX.
> That's too bad.
Yes, that's too bad. So, what should we do?
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX, (continued)
- Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX, Kenichi Handa, 2006/01/12
- Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/01/12
- Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX, Kenichi Handa, 2006/01/12
- Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/01/13
- Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX, Kenichi Handa, 2006/01/13
- Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/01/13
- Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/01/15
- Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX, Kenichi Handa, 2006/01/16
- Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX, Stefan Monnier, 2006/01/13