[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc
From: |
Juri Linkov |
Subject: |
Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Nov 2005 11:18:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> The `other-window' command is invoked with `C-xo', which seems easy to
> type in. `C-xM-#', on the other hand, requires changing from a control
> key to a meta and (on my keyboard) shift key. I think that's a lot
> more awkward to type in (but then my fingers are less than nimble).
Ideally, very frequent commands like `other-window' should be very
easy to type like e.g. 1-key `C-o'. Less frequent commands should have
less easy to type keybindings.
--
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/
- Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc, (continued)
- Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc, Juri Linkov, 2005/11/24
- Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/25
- Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/23
- Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/22
- Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc, Robert J. Chassell, 2005/11/22
- Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc, Andreas Schwab, 2005/11/22
- Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc, Juri Linkov, 2005/11/23
- Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc, Jay Belanger, 2005/11/23
- Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc,
Juri Linkov <=
- Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc, Robert J. Chassell, 2005/11/23
- Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc, Ryan Yeske, 2005/11/20
- Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc, David Kastrup, 2005/11/21
- Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/21
- Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/21
- Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc, Jay Belanger, 2005/11/21
Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc, Jay Belanger, 2005/11/15