[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Multiple debugging sessions
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: Multiple debugging sessions |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Nov 2005 17:56:44 +1300 |
Richard M. Stallman writes:
> It seems I was mistaken in thinking that Nick recognized that
> debugging multiple programs in one Emacs was a desirable goal.
I've not said that it's not desirable, but that its not a trivial task and I
think there are more immediate and important goals. Moving over to GDB/MI
aligns us with GDB development and will make a much more reliable interface.
Since gdb-ui.el uses annotations, it hangs together on a wing and a prayer,
and every time GDB developers change CLI output, which they have every right
to do as its intended for the user and not the front end, it may break.
> I agree that this should be a goal, for after the Emacs 22 release.
Moving over to GDB/MI will change the lisp code considerably, so if someone
wants to do that twice: once for gdb-ui.el and once for the new code, thats
fine.
Nick
- Re: Multiple debugging sessions, (continued)
Re: Multiple debugging sessions [was Re: `overlay-arrow-position' should be automatically buffer-local], Miles Bader, 2005/11/10
Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Nick Roberts, 2005/11/10
Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Andreas Schwab, 2005/11/10
Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/11
Re: Multiple debugging sessions,
Nick Roberts <=
Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Miles Bader, 2005/11/12
Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/11/12
Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/12
Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Nick Roberts, 2005/11/12
Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Miles Bader, 2005/11/10
Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Miles Bader, 2005/11/10
Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Kim F. Storm, 2005/11/11
Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Juri Linkov, 2005/11/11
Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Nick Roberts, 2005/11/10
Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Stefan Monnier, 2005/11/10