[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Nov 2005 10:47:47 +0200 |
> From: David Reitter <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:29:35 +0000
>
> describe-bindings separates the different groups with ^L even though
> the text that is output is intended to be human-readable.
The ^L is there so that one could use forward-page to quickly move to
the next group.
> Isn't there a nicer way the groups can be separated?
We could use overlays to display the ^L as something more visually
appealing, while leaving ^L in the buffer.
> I also get a long list with latin key characters that are bound to
> encoded-kbd-self-insert-ccl.
I think this is a bug.
> As a novice user when trying out the describe-bindings function, I
> would see that there is a lot of uninteresting technical stuff at the
> beginning
Please be more specific: what uninteresting technical stuff is there
at the beginning that you want to remove?
> Lastly, I was wondering if one could use a better name for the menu
> item.
> "List Key Bindings" is of course perfectly correct from an Emacs
> terminology point of view. But as a new user, I would be looking for
> something like "Keyboard Functions" or "Keyboard Shortcuts" or so,
> not for "Bindings".
We could modify the help echo string to mention "shortcuts". I don't
think the name of the menu item itself should change, since this is
Emacs terminology, and newbies need to learn it as fast as possible.
> The Help menu is really important and useful to newbies. It would be
> very helpful if one could make it easier to understand.
That is the goal, yes. But given the limited real estate in the
menus, we need to compromise.
> --Apple-Mail-17-876036934
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
> Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature;
> name=smime.p7s
> Content-Disposition: attachment;
> filename=smime.p7s
Could you please drop this signature stuff? It's very long and thus
annoying. TIA.
- Re: Help menu (was: Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming), (continued)
- Re: Help menu (was: Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming), Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/16
- Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming, Jason Rumney, 2005/11/14
- Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/11/11
- Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/11/11
Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/11/11
- RE: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming, Drew Adams, 2005/11/11
- Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/11/11
- Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming, Robert J. Chassell, 2005/11/11
Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming,
Eli Zaretskii <=
RE: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming, Drew Adams, 2005/11/11
- Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/11/11
- RE: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming, Drew Adams, 2005/11/11
- Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/11/11
- Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming, David Reitter, 2005/11/11
- Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/11/11
- Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming, David Reitter, 2005/11/11