[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: M-g in dired
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: M-g in dired |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:27:21 -0500 |
> Would you like to try modifying that code so it detects the other case?
I think the most appropriate place to modify is `shadow_lookup'.
That sounds right to me.
So, for example, in dired-mode-map where "C-x `" is undefined,
`lookup-key' returns 1:
(lookup-key dired-mode-map [24 96]) => 1
It seems this is not correct.
I agree, that is a bug. Since C-x is a valid prefix key,
the value should not be 1. It should be whatever
the C-x subkeymap gives for `.
Could you fix that?
I can't estimate if there is a code that relies on the current
return value of `lookup-key'. If so, then perhaps a new special
argument could be added to `lookup-key' to change the semantic of
the return value?
Could you study the code some more to try to determine this?
- Re: M-g in dired, Juri Linkov, 2005/11/01
- Re: M-g in dired, Andreas Schwab, 2005/11/01
- Re: M-g in dired,
Richard M. Stallman <=
- Re: M-g in dired, Juri Linkov, 2005/11/03
- Re: M-g in dired, Stefan Monnier, 2005/11/03
- Re: M-g in dired, Juri Linkov, 2005/11/04
- Re: M-g in dired, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/04
- Re: M-g in dired, Juri Linkov, 2005/11/05
- Re: M-g in dired, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/05
- Re: M-g in dired, Juri Linkov, 2005/11/07
- Re: M-g in dired, Stefan Monnier, 2005/11/07
- Re: M-g in dired, Juri Linkov, 2005/11/08
- Re: M-g in dired, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/08