[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: flyspell bug
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: flyspell bug |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Oct 2005 21:00:27 -0400 |
No, I think this is the intended behavior. Flyspell is not spell-checking
the whole buffer for you, only the words that you enter, edit, or are about
to edit (i.e. that the cursor is on). It is not like in MS WORD where all
misspelled words are marked. See the Emacs manual:
That is true of Flyspell mode; but he used flyspell-buffer,
which does check the whole buffer.
I think the explanation is that "defun" is not considered a misspelling.
- Re: flyspell bug, (continued)
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/05
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/05
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/10
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/12
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/13
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/13
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/14
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/14
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/23
- Re: flyspell bug, Piet van Oostrum, 2005/10/23
- Re: flyspell bug,
Richard M. Stallman <=
- Re: flyspell bug, Piet van Oostrum, 2005/10/24
- Re: flyspell bug, Piet van Oostrum, 2005/10/24
- Re: flyspell bug, Piet van Oostrum, 2005/10/24
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/24
- Re: flyspell bug, Agustin Martin, 2005/10/25
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/25
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/24
- Re: flyspell bug, Piet van Oostrum, 2005/10/24
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/24
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/26