[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: image size limit?
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: image size limit? |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Oct 2005 23:39:29 -0400 |
> But I don't think this limit should be absolute. I think it should be
> specified as a multiple of the frame height and width, and it should
> be given as a floating point number. I'd suggest 2.0 as the default
> for this ratio.
What frame should we then use? The selected frame?
The frame that the image is to be displayed in.
That's not really logical, the frame that issues the call to load an
image (which is where we check the image size) may not be the frame
that ends up displaying it.
How could they be different?
- Re: image size limit?, (continued)
- Re: image size limit?, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/12
- Re: image size limit?, Romain Francoise, 2005/10/12
- Re: image size limit?, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/13
- Re: image size limit?, Chong Yidong, 2005/10/14
- Re: image size limit?, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/15
- Re: image size limit?, Chong Yidong, 2005/10/15
- Re: image size limit?, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/16
- Re: image size limit?, Chong Yidong, 2005/10/16
- Re: image size limit?, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/17
- Re: image size limit?, Chong Yidong, 2005/10/17
- Re: image size limit?,
Richard M. Stallman <=
- Re: image size limit?, Stefan Monnier, 2005/10/18
- Re: image size limit?, Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/19
- Re: image size limit?, David Kastrup, 2005/10/19
- Re: image size limit?, Chong Yidong, 2005/10/19
- Re: image size limit?, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/19
- Re: image size limit?, Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/19
- Re: image size limit?, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/19
- Re: image size limit?, Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/19
- Re: image size limit?, Miles Bader, 2005/10/19
- Re: image size limit?, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/20