[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Emacs icons
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: Emacs icons |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Aug 2005 21:23:50 -0700 |
> The idea of using an E on a gnu is ok semantically. Whether it looks
> better than just an E, I am not sure.
Attached is an idea ;-) It don't look too bad when resized as a 16x16
icon.
This could make an attractive _logo_, but it would _not_ work as a 16x16
icon, IMO (see attached). Clever combination of E with gnu head - bravo!
But, as Richard pointed out, that makes it hard to distinguish the E.
Let's not forget the story of "The Gnu Who Became a Mushroom" - that's an
invaluable icon lesson. If shrinking a gnu head can turn it into a mushroom,
there is no hope for shrinking E-gnus and other such artistic subtleties. In
particular, shrunken heads seldom appear brilliant.
16x16 is a hard nut to crack.
ponce-emacs-16x16.gif
Description: GIF image
- RE: Emacs icons (was: Suggestions for the temporary windows usedfrom the minibuffer), (continued)
- Re: Emacs icons, Esben Stien, 2005/08/13
- Re: Emacs icons, Lennart Borgman, 2005/08/14
- Re: Emacs icons, Lennart Borgman, 2005/08/14
- Re: Emacs icons, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/08/15
- Re: Emacs icons, David Ponce, 2005/08/15
- Re: Emacs icons, Lennart Borgman, 2005/08/15
- Re: Emacs icons, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/08/15
- RE: Emacs icons,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: Emacs icons, Lennart Borgman, 2005/08/16
- Re: Emacs icons, Frank Schmitt, 2005/08/16
- Re: Emacs icons, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/08/16
- Re: Emacs icons, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/08/17
- Re: Emacs icons, Gian Uberto Lauri, 2005/08/17
- Re: Emacs icons, Lennart Borgman, 2005/08/17
- Re: Emacs icons, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/08/18
- Re: Emacs icons, Lennart Borgman, 2005/08/18
- Re: Emacs icons, Gian Uberto Lauri, 2005/08/18
- Re: Emacs icons, Frank Schmitt, 2005/08/18