[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ?\ vs. ?\s
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: ?\ vs. ?\s |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 17:28:37 +0200 |
> > Much as I'd like to hear "no" to the first question, I'd assume a
> > resounding "yes". So...
>
> YES.
Humm. Yes meaning "OK to change" or yes meaning "Not OK" to change?
Because in my question, "yes" meant "yes, I'm gonna be very pissed if
you change it" :)
> However, be careful not to change code which is supposed to be
> used on other emacsen too...
That's the usual problem. As I see it:
- OK to change:
lisp/* (non-recursive)
lisp/calc/*
lisp/calendar/*
lisp/emacs-lisp/*
lisp/emulation/*
lisp/international/*
lisp/language/*
lisp/net/* except lisp/net/tramp*
lisp/obsolete/*
lisp/play/*
lisp/term/*
lisp/toolbar/*
lisp/url/*
- Not OK to change:
lisp/eshell/*
lisp/gnus/*
lisp/mh-e/*
lisp/net/tramp*
- Not sure:
lisp/mail/*
lisp/progmodes/* (in particular cc-*, ada*, idlw*)
lisp/textmodes/* (" " artist, *spell, org, reftex*)
--
/L/e/k/t/u
- ?\ vs. ?\s, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/06/28
- Re: ?\ vs. ?\s, Kim F. Storm, 2005/06/28
- Re: ?\ vs. ?\s,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: ?\ vs. ?\s, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/06/28
- Re: ?\ vs. ?\s, Kim F. Storm, 2005/06/29
- Re: ?\ vs. ?\s, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/06/29
- Re: ?\ vs. ?\s, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/06/29
- Re: ?\ vs. ?\s, Kim F. Storm, 2005/06/29
- Re: ?\ vs. ?\s, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/29
Re: ?\ vs. ?\s, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/29