[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Documentation not clear for the Lisp function set-variable
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: Documentation not clear for the Lisp function set-variable |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Jun 2005 17:44:49 +0200 |
On 6/27/05, Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden> wrote:
> Try this patch, please. It doesn't modify `set-variable' but
> `user-variable-p', so it returns t for non-obsolete aliases of user
> variables.
Well, it is also necessary to detect alias loops. The problem is:
what should `user-variable-p' do when passed a variable which is in an
alias loop? Throw an error or return nil? I prefer the latter, as
`user-variable-p' is almost always used as predicate to completion
functions, apropos* or `mapatoms', where throwing an error would be
inappropriate.
--
/L/e/k/t/u
Index: src/eval.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/emacs/emacs/src/eval.c,v
retrieving revision 1.245
diff -u -2 -r1.245 eval.c
--- src/eval.c 27 Jun 2005 05:59:23 -0000 1.245
+++ src/eval.c 27 Jun 2005 15:37:53 -0000
@@ -94,4 +94,5 @@
Lisp_Object Qdebug_on_error;
Lisp_Object Qdeclare;
+Lisp_Object Qbyte_obsolete_variable;
/* This holds either the symbol `run-hooks' or nil.
@@ -890,18 +891,35 @@
}
+/* Error handler used in Fuser_variable_p. */
+static Lisp_Object
+user_variable_p_eh (ignore)
+ Lisp_Object ignore;
+{
+ return Qnil;
+}
+
DEFUN ("user-variable-p", Fuser_variable_p, Suser_variable_p, 1, 1, 0,
doc: /* Returns t if VARIABLE is intended to be set and
modified by users.
\(The alternative is a variable used internally in a Lisp program.)
Determined by whether the first character of the documentation
-for the variable is `*' or if the variable is customizable (has a non-nil
-value of `standard-value' or of `custom-autoload' on its property list). */)
+for the variable is `*', the variable is customizable (has a non-nil
+value of `standard-value' or of `custom-autoload' on its property list),
+or it is a non-obsolete alias for another user variable. */)
(variable)
Lisp_Object variable;
{
Lisp_Object documentation;
+ struct Lisp_Symbol *sym;
if (!SYMBOLP (variable))
return Qnil;
+ sym = XSYMBOL (variable);
+ /* If indirect and there's an alias loop, don't check anything else. */
+ if (sym->indirect_variable
+ && NILP (internal_condition_case_1 (indirect_variable, variable,
+ Qt, user_variable_p_eh)))
+ return Qnil;
+
documentation = Fget (variable, Qvariable_documentation);
if (INTEGERP (documentation) && XINT (documentation) < 0)
@@ -916,8 +934,15 @@
&& XINT (XCDR (documentation)) < 0)
return Qt;
- /* Customizable? See `custom-variable-p'. */
+ /* Customizable? See `custom-variable-p'. */
if ((!NILP (Fget (variable, intern ("standard-value"))))
|| (!NILP (Fget (variable, intern ("custom-autoload")))))
return Qt;
+
+ /* An indirect variable? Let's follow the chain. */
+ sym = XSYMBOL (variable);
+ if (sym->indirect_variable
+ && NILP (Fget (variable, Qbyte_obsolete_variable)))
+ return Fuser_variable_p (sym->value);
+
return Qnil;
}
@@ -3410,4 +3435,7 @@
staticpro (&Qdeclare);
+ Qbyte_obsolete_variable = intern ("byte-obsolete-variable");
+ staticpro (&Qbyte_obsolete_variable);
+
/* Note that the process handling also uses Qexit, but we don't want
to staticpro it twice, so we just do it here. */
- Documentation not clear for the Lisp function set-variable, Yoni Rabkin, 2005/06/19
- Re: Documentation not clear for the Lisp function set-variable, Richard Stallman, 2005/06/19
- Re: Documentation not clear for the Lisp function set-variable, Yoni Rabkin, 2005/06/20
- Re: Documentation not clear for the Lisp function set-variable, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/06/20
- Re: Documentation not clear for the Lisp function set-variable, Juri Linkov, 2005/06/26
- Re: Documentation not clear for the Lisp function set-variable, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/06/27
- Re: Documentation not clear for the Lisp function set-variable,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: Documentation not clear for the Lisp function set-variable, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/06/27
- Re: Documentation not clear for the Lisp function set-variable, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/06/27
- Re: Documentation not clear for the Lisp function set-variable, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/06/27
- Re: Documentation not clear for the Lisp function set-variable, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/06/27
- Re: Documentation not clear for the Lisp function set-variable, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/28
- Re: Documentation not clear for the Lisp function set-variable, Juri Linkov, 2005/06/27
- Re: Documentation not clear for the Lisp function set-variable, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/06/28
- Re: Documentation not clear for the Lisp function set-variable, Juri Linkov, 2005/06/29
- Re: Documentation not clear for the Lisp function set-variable, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/06/29
- Re: Documentation not clear for the Lisp function set-variable, Juri Linkov, 2005/06/29