[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Q on NaN
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Q on NaN |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:35:05 -0400 |
BTW, here is something I didn't expect:
`M-: 0.0e+NaN' returns -0.0e+NaN
`M-: -0.0e+NaN' returns 0.0e+NaN
The reader seems to flip the (irrelevant) sign.
I fixed that. Thanks.
- Q on NaN, Drew Adams, 2005/06/24
- RE: Q on NaN, Drew Adams, 2005/06/24
- Re: Q on NaN, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/06/24
- RE: Q on NaN, Drew Adams, 2005/06/24
- Re: Q on NaN, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/06/24
- Re: Q on NaN, Gaƫtan LEURENT, 2005/06/24
- Re: Q on NaN, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/06/24
- RE: Q on NaN, Drew Adams, 2005/06/24
- Re: Q on NaN, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/06/24
- RE: Q on NaN, Drew Adams, 2005/06/24
- Re: Q on NaN,
Richard M. Stallman <=
RE: Q on NaN, Drew Adams, 2005/06/24