[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Scroll lock
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Scroll lock |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:54:47 -0400 |
> I think extending the `scroll-preserve-screen-position' is a good
> thing. I noticed that now `scroll-preserve-screen-position' even
> stopped to do what is described in its docstring. In a year old
> CVS version, when `scroll-preserve-screen-position' is t, `M-1 M-v'
> preserved the screen position, but in the current CVS it doesn't do
> that. This looks like a bug.
AFAICS this behavior is intentional:
I now remember that that's what the variable was originally supposed
to do. Someone reported it had been changed, so I changed it back.
- Scroll lock, Ralf Angeli, 2005/06/21
- Re: Scroll lock, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/22
- Re: Scroll lock, Ralf Angeli, 2005/06/22
- Re: Scroll lock, Juri Linkov, 2005/06/22
- Re: Scroll lock, Ralf Angeli, 2005/06/22
- Re: Scroll lock,
Richard M. Stallman <=
- Re: Scroll lock, Ralf Angeli, 2005/06/23
- Re: Scroll lock, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/24
- Re: Scroll lock, Ralf Angeli, 2005/06/26
- Re: Scroll lock, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/22
- Re: Scroll lock, Miles Bader, 2005/06/23
- Re: Scroll lock, Ralf Angeli, 2005/06/23
- Re: Scroll lock, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/24
- Re: Scroll lock, Ralf Angeli, 2005/06/26
- Re: Scroll lock, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/27
- Re: Scroll lock, Ralf Angeli, 2005/06/29