[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: enriched-mode problems
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: enriched-mode problems |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Jun 2005 18:58:15 -0400 |
Anyway, it seems pretty natural to offer minor modes with a
customizable default setting, and not all minor modes might be 100%
user-preference.
Minor modes are supposed to be used for user preferences. Things
which are not user preferences should be handled with variables that
are not minor modes and not called "mode".
I know people don't follow the conventions all the time, but we will
not design Emacs features for the sake of not following the
conventions of Emacs.
- Re: enriched-mode problems, (continued)
- Re: enriched-mode problems, Richard Stallman, 2005/06/16
- Re: enriched-mode problems, Lute Kamstra, 2005/06/16
- Re: enriched-mode problems, Richard Stallman, 2005/06/17
- Re: enriched-mode problems, Lute Kamstra, 2005/06/19
- Re: enriched-mode problems, Richard Stallman, 2005/06/19
- Re: enriched-mode problems, David Kastrup, 2005/06/20
- Re: enriched-mode problems, Richard Stallman, 2005/06/20
- Re: enriched-mode problems, David Kastrup, 2005/06/21
- Re: enriched-mode problems, Gaƫtan LEURENT, 2005/06/21
- Re: enriched-mode problems,
Richard M. Stallman <=