[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Version of the Lisp Manual.
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Version of the Lisp Manual. |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Jun 2005 18:37:23 -0400 |
> And if we think it could confuse, we could remove the edition from
> this sentence.
I'm in favor of that. What about the patch below?
I don't think there is any problem here. Please don't change it
further.
Please let's not spend any more time discussing this.
- Version of the Lisp Manual., Lute Kamstra, 2005/06/08
- Re: Version of the Lisp Manual., Eli Zaretskii, 2005/06/08
- Re: Version of the Lisp Manual., Lute Kamstra, 2005/06/08
- Re: Version of the Lisp Manual., Eli Zaretskii, 2005/06/08
- Re: Version of the Lisp Manual., Lute Kamstra, 2005/06/09
- Re: Version of the Lisp Manual., Eli Zaretskii, 2005/06/09
- Re: Version of the Lisp Manual., Lute Kamstra, 2005/06/09
- Re: Version of the Lisp Manual., Eli Zaretskii, 2005/06/10
- Re: Version of the Lisp Manual., Lute Kamstra, 2005/06/10
- Re: Version of the Lisp Manual.,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Version of the Lisp Manual., Richard Stallman, 2005/06/09