[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs defeats ClearType
From: |
David Abrahams |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs defeats ClearType |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Jun 2005 09:20:27 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (windows-nt) |
Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
> On 6/7/05, David Abrahams <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Yes, if you're concerned about redrawing the minimum possible number
>> of characters on a line, you don't want to do that. I think that's a
>> needless optimization in most cases, but I'm sure there are machines
>> and buffers where you can observe a difference in speed.
>
> Font metric bogosities that cause greatly excessive redraw can
> definitely result in annoying flickering though, even on machines
> which are fast enough that you don't notice the actual redrawing.
In that case I think the patch I posted is probably the best we can
do.
> [This is the case on X11 anyway; unless the ms-windows port is doing
> double-buffering, I expect the same is true there.]
I haven't noticed it there. FWIW.
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
- Emacs defeats ClearType, David Abrahams, 2005/06/02
- Re: Emacs defeats ClearType, jasonr, 2005/06/03
- Re: Emacs defeats ClearType, David Abrahams, 2005/06/03
- Re: Emacs defeats ClearType, David Abrahams, 2005/06/03
- [PING] ClearType Patch, David Abrahams, 2005/06/08
- Re: [PING] ClearType Patch, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/06/08
- Re: [PING] ClearType Patch, David Abrahams, 2005/06/08
- Re: [PING] ClearType Patch, Stefan Monnier, 2005/06/08
- Re: [PING] ClearType Patch, David Abrahams, 2005/06/08
- Re: [PING] ClearType Patch, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/06/08
- Re: [PING] ClearType Patch, David Abrahams, 2005/06/08
- Re: [PING] ClearType Patch, jasonr, 2005/06/08
- Re: [PING] ClearType Patch, jasonr, 2005/06/08
- Re: [PING] ClearType Patch, David Abrahams, 2005/06/08