Re: Documenting define-generic-mode.

[Lute Kamstra]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

>        Similar defining macros use unquoted symbols too.  To be backward
>        compatible, quoting the symbol is still allowed.
>
>     Then the original text is OK.  I just thought that it _had_ to be
>     [un]quoted, as in most macros.
>
> For simplicity and consistency, we should document it as using an
> unquoted arg.  There is no need to document the compatibility feature
> of accepting the arg with a quote.
>
> (It seems to be documented this way already.)

Apparently, I read your mind.  ;-)

Lute.