Re: Suspicious code in gnus-read-descriptions-file

[Jesper Harder]

Stefan <address@hidden> writes:

>> But if point /is/ changed, I've often found it pretty hard to be
>> absolutely sure if saving point is actually intended and required.
>
> There's indeed the possibility that the code is usually called with
> nntp-server-buffer already the current buffer and point in
> nntp-server-buffer needs to be saved.

Yup, that's what I was thinking about.  I think I've encountered a few
places like that.  

It's probably not an issue in your changes ... but it's something you
should have in mind when making this type of change.