[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: push and pop
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: push and pop |
Date: |
Sun, 9 Jan 2005 13:42:47 -0600 (CST) |
JD Smith wrote:
Is there a technical reason the subr push and pop can't behave
like the cl versions?
I would guess because Elisp does not have `setf' and hence not this
CL-type very general notion of setting a "place".
I suspect they're the most commonly used of the cl macros, and it's
confusing to have similarly named macros with different behavior.
At least they only differ in cases where the Elisp version throws an error.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- push and pop, JD Smith, 2005/01/07
- Re: push and pop, David Kastrup, 2005/01/07
- Re: push and pop, Stefan Monnier, 2005/01/08
- Re: push and pop, JD Smith, 2005/01/07
- Re: push and pop, Miles Bader, 2005/01/07
- Re: push and pop, Richard Stallman, 2005/01/08
- Re: push and pop, JD Smith, 2005/01/09
- Re: push and pop, Francis Litterio, 2005/01/09
- Re: push and pop,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- Re: push and pop, David Kastrup, 2005/01/09
- Re: push and pop, Richard Stallman, 2005/01/10