[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug 130397
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Bug 130397 |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:02:14 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> But ispell.el should be able to automatically check whether the chars can be
>> safely encoded with the coding-system and if not (as in your example),
>> ispell.el will know that the word can't be checked by ispell and should
>> just be skipped (and maybe marked as "uncheckable").
> That seems to be a good approach. But, just checking
> whether the chars is encodable with the coding-system is not
> enough. For instance, entry for "francais" dict doesn't
> contain "ñ" in CASECHARS, but "español" is safely encodable
> by iso-8859-1. So, the same error happens. For ispell.el
> to know that "español" is uncheckable, we anyway need the
> current database ispell-dictionary-alist.
Aaaahhhh.... I'm beginning to understand, thank you.
But I still think ispell.el should not try to check "espa" and "ol".
So I now agree that the CASECHARS table is needed, but it should be used
after encoding the word (rather than when determining what is a word), and
if some char is not in CASECHARS the word should be flagged as uncheckable.
> By the way, isn't it possible to make that database
> automatically from *.aff?
I wouldn't know.
Stefan
- Re: Bug 130397 (Was: Emacs - Ispell problem with i[no]german dictionary), Kenichi Handa, 2005/01/04
- Re: Bug 130397, Stefan, 2005/01/04
- Re: Bug 130397, Kenichi Handa, 2005/01/04
- Re: Bug 130397, Stefan Monnier, 2005/01/04
- Re: Bug 130397, Kenichi Handa, 2005/01/05
- Re: Bug 130397,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Bug 130397, Kenichi Handa, 2005/01/05
- Re: Bug 130397, Ken Stevens, 2005/01/06
- Re: Bug 130397, Stefan Monnier, 2005/01/06
- Re: Bug 130397, Kenichi Handa, 2005/01/06
- Re: Bug 130397, Agustin Martin, 2005/01/07
- Re: Bug 130397, Geoff Kuenning, 2005/01/08
- Re: Bug 130397, David Kastrup, 2005/01/08
- Re: Bug 130397, Miles Bader, 2005/01/09
- Re: Bug 130397, Geoff Kuenning, 2005/01/09
- Re: Bug 130397, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/01/10