[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnus/html2text.el
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: gnus/html2text.el |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:08:57 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
> When I use `with-no-warnings', I first compile without the
> `with-no-warnings', to see which warnings I get, then I put in the form
> and compile again.
Nice theory. And next thing you know reality strikes:
when you modify code do you first remove all "with-no-warnings", recompile,
check the output and then put the with-no-warnings back in?
If you could ensure that the code within with-no-warnings was never gonna
change (and that the functions/macros it uses will never again be changed
either), it would be OK, but that's not how things actually happen.
Stefan
- gnus/html2text.el, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/10/24
- Re: gnus/html2text.el, Reiner Steib, 2004/10/25
- Re: gnus/html2text.el, Richard Stallman, 2004/10/26
- Re: gnus/html2text.el, Stefan Monnier, 2004/10/26
- Re: gnus/html2text.el, Kim F. Storm, 2004/10/26
- Re: gnus/html2text.el, Stefan Monnier, 2004/10/26
- Re: gnus/html2text.el, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/10/26
- Re: gnus/html2text.el,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: gnus/html2text.el, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/10/26
- Re: gnus/html2text.el, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/10/26
- Re: gnus/html2text.el, Miles Bader, 2004/10/26
- Re: gnus/html2text.el, Richard Stallman, 2004/10/27
Re: gnus/html2text.el, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/10/26
Re: gnus/html2text.el, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/10/26