[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: small Eshell docfix
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: small Eshell docfix |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Sep 2004 00:53:27 -0400 |
So I say: Emacs is the best advertising medium, the best promotion of
the idea of Free Software. So, in my point of view there is value in
itself if it runs smoothly on non-free operating systems like MS
Windows or MacOS. It is, so to speak, a foot in the door.
All else being equal, it is useful that Emacs runs on these systems.
But that's not the issue at hand. The issue at hand is whether to
design Emacs features to work better in the context of the GNU system
or to design them to work better in the context of Windows, in cases
where those two goals conflict.
- Re: small Eshell docfix, Oliver Scholz, 2004/09/01
- Re: small Eshell docfix,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: small Eshell docfix, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/01
- Re: small Eshell docfix, Emilio Lopes, 2004/09/01
- Re: small Eshell docfix, Miles Bader, 2004/09/01
- Re: small Eshell docfix, Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/02
- Re: small Eshell docfix, Emilio Lopes, 2004/09/02
- Re: small Eshell docfix, John Wiegley, 2004/09/06
- Re: small Eshell docfix, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/09/06
- Re: small Eshell docfix, Alex Schroeder, 2004/09/07
- Re: small Eshell docfix, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/09/07
- Re: small Eshell docfix, Alex Schroeder, 2004/09/07