[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: term.el and undo
From: |
Florian Weimer |
Subject: |
Re: term.el and undo |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Aug 2004 14:59:24 +0200 |
* David Kastrup:
> However, since the whole point of term is to provide an
> ncurses-capable terminal, and since undo or any other output or cursor
> movement operation not initiated from the device writing into the
> pseudotty would lead to a discrepancy between the screen contents and
> the application's expectations, _any_ editing by the user including
> undo would seem completely pointless.
Minor nitpick: In *line* *mode*, undo does make sense, because the
application doesn't see any data before the user presses RET. (Line
mode is the default mode, and typically it supports limited line
editing via ^H, ^W and ^U.)
Re: term.el and undo, Mark Plaksin, 2004/08/24