[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Years in copyright notices
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Years in copyright notices |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Jun 2004 04:22:21 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 10:08:41AM +0200, Kim F. Storm wrote:
> A Miles pointed out, this will lead to some merge conflicts, but since
> this is legal stuff, we have to accept that inconvenience.
Richard's post indicated that we do _not_ have to `accept that
inconvenience', that it isn't a critical point.
> I can do this if you approve.
Making sure the copyright notices include the appropriate years is reasonable
-- and probably won't result in all that many problems because many files are
already up-to-date -- but changing the date format is apparently not
necessary (according to Richard's post), and will result in many more
conflicts.
-Miles
--
Any man who is a triangle, has thee right, when in Cartesian Space, to
have angles, which when summed, come to know more, nor no less, than
nine score degrees, should he so wish. [TEMPLE OV THEE LEMUR]
- Years in copyright notices, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/17
- Re: Years in copyright notices, Kim F. Storm, 2004/06/17
- Re: Years in copyright notices, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/06/21
- Re: Years in copyright notices, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/06/22
- Re: Years in copyright notices, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/22
- Re: Years in copyright notices, Kim F. Storm, 2004/06/23
- Re: Years in copyright notices,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Years in copyright notices, Kim F. Storm, 2004/06/23
- Re: Years in copyright notices, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/24
- Re: Years in copyright notices, Miles Bader, 2004/06/24
- Re: Years in copyright notices, Kevin Ryde, 2004/06/23