[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Do we need legal papers
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Do we need legal papers |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Nov 2003 09:25:24 -0500 |
> Did anything specific lead you to the conclusion that we had finished
> handling his papers?
This is too much. We got the following message.
That message says that he began the process of filling out legal
papers. He sent email to fsf-records, who presumably sent him papers
by snail mail.
Before we install the code, we have to wait for the signed papers to
be received and recorded. (We may also need papers from his employer;
I do not know, but fsf-records would have told him.)
Have you read the file maintain.texi which explains these procedures?
- Do we need legal papers [was: patch for unexmacosx.c: supporting non-prebound dynamic library], Kim F. Storm, 2003/11/01
- Re: Do we need legal papers [was: patch for unexmacosx.c: supporting non-prebound dynamic library], Andrew Choi, 2003/11/01
- Re: Do we need legal papers [was: patch for unexmacosx.c: supporting non-prebound dynamic library], Richard Stallman, 2003/11/02
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Andrew Choi, 2003/11/02
- Re: Do we need legal papers,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Andrew Choi, 2003/11/04
- Re: Do we need legal papers, David Kastrup, 2003/11/04
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Kim F. Storm, 2003/11/04
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Dave Carlton, 2003/11/05
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Joseph C. Slater, 2003/11/05
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Richard Stallman, 2003/11/05
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Andrew Choi, 2003/11/06
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Sébastien Kirche, 2003/11/07
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Kim F. Storm, 2003/11/09
Re: Do we need legal papers [was: patch for unexmacosx.c: supporting non-prebound dynamic library], Richard Stallman, 2003/11/02