[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [mew-int 01585] Re: windows 1252
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [mew-int 01585] Re: windows 1252 |
Date: |
04 Nov 2003 07:55:07 +0200 |
> Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 11:13:34 +0900 (JST)
> From: Kazu Yamamoto (=?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCOzNLXE9CSScbKEI=?=) <address@hidden>
> (2) Co-exist of Emacs and XEmacs.
>
> The 'emacs-mule coding-system is not appropriate since XEmacs
> has a different internal representation from Emacs'one. Note
> Emacsen use different 'emacs-mule coding-system among
> versions.
>
> The one-and-only coding-system which, I found, meets the requirements
> above is 'ctext.
In that case, extending ctext to handle the problem we were discussing
in this thread would not be a good idea: IIRC, XEmacs doesn't support
extended segments, and non-MULE Emacsen certainly don't. Or am I
missing something?
- Re: [mew-int 01582] Re: windows 1252, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/11/01
- Re: [mew-int 01582] Re: windows 1252, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/11/02
- Re: [mew-int 01585] Re: windows 1252, 山本和彦, 2003/11/03
- Re: [mew-int 01585] Re: windows 1252, Stefan Monnier, 2003/11/04
- Re: [mew-int 01590] Re: windows 1252, 山本和彦, 2003/11/04
- Re: [mew-int 01590] Re: windows 1252, Stefan Monnier, 2003/11/04
- Re: [mew-int 01590] Re: windows 1252, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/11/04
- Re: [mew-int 01593] Re: windows 1252, 山本和彦, 2003/11/04
- Re: [mew-int 01593] Re: windows 1252, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/11/05
- Re: [mew-int 01593] Re: windows 1252, Kenichi Handa, 2003/11/07
- Re: [mew-int 01593] Re: windows 1252, Kenichi Handa, 2003/11/07