[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Oct 2003 21:48:21 -0400 |
> We certainly would not document a MIME library in the Emacs Lisp
> manual, because it is useful only for mail readers, and that is too
> specialized.
It is no less specialized than primitives like base64-decode-region.
Those are primitives, and they are simple to document.
Anyway, I'm just telling you what our policy is. Not every Emacs Lisp
facility has to be documented in the Emacs Lisp manual.
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, (continued)
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/10/17
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Peter S Galbraith, 2003/10/17
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/20
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Peter S Galbraith, 2003/10/20
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Satyaki Das, 2003/10/17
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2003/10/17
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/10/18
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/18
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/10/19
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Alex Schroeder, 2003/10/19
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Alexander Pohoyda, 2003/10/20
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2003/10/20
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Alexander Pohoyda, 2003/10/20
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/20
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Ehud Karni, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/10/17
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Ehud Karni, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Alexander Pohoyda, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Ehud Karni, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/10/16