[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Will default key bindings spell the death of Emacs?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Will default key bindings spell the death of Emacs? |
Date: |
03 Jun 2003 00:05:21 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
Kevin Rodgers <address@hidden> writes:
> How about:
>
>
> (kbd (read-string "Key (`kbd' format): "))
>
> That seems to require the following patch; is this a known bug in `kbd'?
>
> *** emacs-21.3/lisp/subr.el.orig Fri Oct 18 19:21:10 2002
> --- emacs-21.3/lisp/subr.el Mon Jun 2 15:25:36 2003
> ***************
> *** 438,444 ****
> "Convert KEYS to the internal Emacs key representation.
> KEYS should be a string constant in the format used for
> saving keyboard macros (see `insert-kbd-macro')."
> ! (read-kbd-macro keys))
>
> (put 'keyboard-translate-table 'char-table-extra-slots 0)
>
> --- 438,444 ----
> "Convert KEYS to the internal Emacs key representation.
> KEYS should be a string constant in the format used for
> saving keyboard macros (see `insert-kbd-macro')."
> ! `(read-kbd-macro ,keys))
>
> (put 'keyboard-translate-table 'char-table-extra-slots 0)
Well, what about "KEYS should be a string constant" don't you
understand? It is documented right there in the piece you have quoted
in the patch, and it is probably this way for efficiency reasons.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Will default key bindings spell the death of Emacs?, (continued)
- Re: Will default key bindings spell the death of Emacs?, Richard Stallman, 2003/06/01
- Re: Will default key bindings spell the death of Emacs?, Richard Stallman, 2003/06/02
- Re: Will default key bindings spell the death of Emacs?, Kevin Rodgers, 2003/06/02
- Re: Will default key bindings spell the death of Emacs?,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Will default key bindings spell the death of Emacs?, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/06/02
Re: Will default key bindings spell the death of Emacs?, Andreas Schwab, 2003/06/04