[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Apr 2003 17:51:36 -0400 |
> A skeleton is basically a list. Each element of the list is either a
> string, a piece of lisp code, a sub-skeleton list or something to be
> reinterpreted by skeleton-internal-1, basically anything that lisp
> allows as a list member. The only reason a bare - would occur in an
> existing skeleton is if someone was using it as a variable name for some
> obscure purpoose. It is quite unlikely that any existing skeleton has
> any bare -'s, the only use would be as parts of strings or character
> constants using the usual lisp syntax for such.
>
> In that case I see no harm in this change. Stephan, would you like
> to install it?
I'm kind of away right now, so if someone else can do it, that would be best.
Stefan
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, (continued)
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Joe Kelsey, 2003/04/20
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Stefan Monnier, 2003/04/21
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Joe Kelsey, 2003/04/21
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Stefan Monnier, 2003/04/22
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Joe Kelsey, 2003/04/22
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/21
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Joe Kelsey, 2003/04/21
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/23
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Joe Kelsey, 2003/04/24
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/25
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/29
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/02