[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: skeleton.el _ versus @
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: skeleton.el _ versus @ |
Date: |
01 Apr 2003 20:17:39 -0500 |
Joe Kelsey <address@hidden> writes:
My question is when was the _ @ distinction ruined by allowing @ to
override the meaning of _. Was it introduced by the original skeleton
author, or was it inserted on-the-sly by someone else? What does the cvs
history say, or is it even recorded in the cvs history?
if you ask these questions (and find the answers) before forming your belief,
perhaps your position would not need to rely so heavily on belief, and thus
(ironically) be more "believable". please post your analysis of "cvs log
skeleton.el" output so i can learn your thought process.
thi
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, Miles Bader, 2003/04/01
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, Stefan Monnier, 2003/04/01
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, Joe Kelsey, 2003/04/01
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, Daniel Pfeiffer, 2003/04/03
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, Stefan Monnier, 2003/04/09
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, Joe Kelsey, 2003/04/09
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/10
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, Joe Kelsey, 2003/04/10
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/11
- Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, Stefan Monnier, 2003/04/11