[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: file-relative-name and remote files
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: file-relative-name and remote files |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 19:52:34 -0500 |
Richard has decided that ".." shall not be used to cross file handler
boundaries.
I'd rather say that it seems best if .. does not cross file handler
boundaries. But I am not entirely sure. This is a knotty situation,
and neither choice seems entirely right, but it seems that there's a
stronger argument in favor of this approach: it permits constructs
that are impossible the other way.
- Re: file-relative-name and remote files, (continued)
- Re: file-relative-name and remote files, Lars Hansen, 2003/03/08
- Re: file-relative-name and remote files, Lars Hansen, 2003/03/11
- Re: file-relative-name and remote files, Lars Hansen, 2003/03/12
- Re: file-relative-name and remote files, Lars Hansen, 2003/03/14
- Re: file-relative-name and remote files, Kai Großjohann, 2003/03/24
- Re: file-relative-name and remote files,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: file-relative-name and remote files, Lars Hansen, 2003/03/24
- Re: file-relative-name and remote files, Lars Hansen, 2003/03/25