[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Customize Rogue
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: Customize Rogue |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Mar 2003 09:43:30 -0600 (CST) |
Benjamin Riefenstahll wrote:
How about something like:
If you specify :set, the docstring should always mention how the
same configuration can be achived without customize.
That may also serve as a hint to package writers that such a means
should always exist.
If one could rigorously enforce this, then that would be the absolute
ideal and there would be no need whatsoever for custom-setq,
set-activate or anything like it. The only problem is whether it is
possible to do that in practice.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- Re: Customize Rogue, (continued)
- Re: Customize Rogue, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/03/13
- Re: Customize Rogue, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/03/13
- Re: Customize Rogue, Richard Stallman, 2003/03/14
- Re: Customize Rogue, Richard Stallman, 2003/03/10
- Re: Customize Rogue, Juanma Barranquero, 2003/03/10
- Re: Customize Rogue, Benjamin Riefenstahl, 2003/03/11
- Re: Customize Rogue,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- Re: Customize Rogue, Benjamin Riefenstahl, 2003/03/11
- Re: Customize Rogue, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/03/11
- Re: Customize Rogue, Per Abrahamsen, 2003/03/12
- Re: Customize Rogue, Richard Stallman, 2003/03/12
- Re: Customize Rogue, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/03/12
- Re: Customize Rogue, Per Abrahamsen, 2003/03/13
- Re: Customize Rogue, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/03/13
- Re: Customize Rogue, Richard Stallman, 2003/03/12
- Re: Customize Rogue, Richard Stallman, 2003/03/12
- Re: Customize Rogue, Per Abrahamsen, 2003/03/12