[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: file-relative-name and remote files
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: file-relative-name and remote files |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 11:27:53 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 04:43:48PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> I can't remember, but I think it has a similar meaning as the "//" special
> case on some other systems. Both "//" and "/.." are not required to be
> the same as "/" according to POSIX.
CMU CS used to have a remote filesystem that used `/..' as a meta-root
(I think it was developed as part of the spice project [precursor of mach]).
I'm not sure if that's still used anywhere though.
-Miles
--
We live, as we dream -- alone....
- Re: file-relative-name and remote files, (continued)
- Re: file-relative-name and remote files, Richard Stallman, 2003/02/25
- Re: file-relative-name and remote files, Kai Großjohann, 2003/02/27
- Re: file-relative-name and remote files, Kai Großjohann, 2003/02/27
- Re: file-relative-name and remote files, Andreas Schwab, 2003/02/27
- Re: file-relative-name and remote files, Kai Großjohann, 2003/02/28
- Re: file-relative-name and remote files, Andreas Schwab, 2003/02/28
- Re: file-relative-name and remote files,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: file-relative-name and remote files, Stefan Monnier, 2003/02/28
- Re: file-relative-name and remote files, Andreas Schwab, 2003/02/28
Re: file-relative-name and remote files, Lars Hansen, 2003/02/27