[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ?\_ patch
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: ?\_ patch |
Date: |
Sun, 09 Feb 2003 07:39:22 -0500 |
Morever, `#' is _good_ becaues it's the general lisp syntax for special
syntax, so a lisp programmer will be much more likely to realize what's
going
on (if he's unfamiliar with this particular bit of syntax) if he sees #\SPC
than if he sees ?SPC.
? is already our syntax for character constants; I see no reason
for changing that.
- Re: ?\_ patch, (continued)
- Re: ?\_ patch, John Paul Wallington, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, John Paul Wallington, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Miles Bader, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/08
- Re: ?\_ patch, Miles Bader, 2003/02/09
- Re: ?\_ patch, Dmitry Paduchikh, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Damien Elmes, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: ?\_ patch, Andreas Schwab, 2003/02/10
- Re: ?\_ patch, Richard Stallman, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Andreas Schwab, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Richard Stallman, 2003/02/10
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/10
- Re: ?\_ patch, Richard Stallman, 2003/02/11
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/12
- Re: ?\_ patch, Richard Stallman, 2003/02/13
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/13