[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCHES] 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCHES] 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5 |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Jan 2003 23:19:43 -0500 |
The above usage in pop.c does not seem correct to me -- aren't symbols
beginning with _ supposed to be reserved for the compilation system, to
avoid
conflicts such as this one?
Yes, I thyink that is true. Perhaps we should change Emacs to use P
instead of _P. But that is a rather large change, albeit not a very
deep one.
- Re: [PATCHES] 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Joe Buehler, 2003/01/03
- Re: [PATCHES] 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: [PATCHES] 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Kim F. Storm, 2003/01/04
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Benjamin Riefenstahl, 2003/01/05
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Kim F. Storm, 2003/01/05
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Joe Buehler, 2003/01/07
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/07
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Kim F. Storm, 2003/01/07
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/07
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Kim F. Storm, 2003/01/08
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/09
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Kim F. Storm, 2003/01/10